Form 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


Form 10-Q

 


(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 0-13163

 


Acxiom Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 


 

DELAWARE   71-0581897

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

P.O. Box 8180, 1 Information Way,

Little Rock, Arkansas

  72203
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

(501) 342-1000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Large accelerated filer  x            Accelerated filer  ¨            Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share outstanding as of August 3, 2006 was 88,067,274.

 



ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

June 30, 2006

 

         Page No.
Part I.   Financial Information   
    Item 1.   Financial Statements    3
 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 (Unaudited)

   3
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)

   4
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months ended June 30, 2006 (Unaudited)

   5
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the Three Months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)

   6 - 7
 

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

   8
      1.   Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies    8
      2.   Earnings per share and stockholders’ equity    9
      3.   Share-based compensation    10 - 13
      4.   Acquisitions and divestitures    14 - 15
      5.   Other current and noncurrent assets    15 - 16
      6.   Goodwill    16
      7.   Long-term obligations    17
      8.   Allowance for doubtful accounts    18
      9.   Segment information    18
      10.   Restructuring impairment and other charges    18
      11.   Commitments and contingencies    19 - 20
    Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    21 - 34
    Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk    35
    Item 4.   Controls and Procedures    35
Part II.   Other Information   
    Item 1.   Legal Proceedings    36
    Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds    36
    Item 6.   Exhibits    37
Signature    38

 

2


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financials Statements

ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

 

     June 30,
2006
    March 31,
2006
 
ASSETS     

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 4,163     $ 7,705  

Trade accounts receivable, net

     264,933       261,624  

Deferred income taxes

     24,517       24,587  

Other current assets

     45,204       44,937  
                

Total current assets

     338,817       338,853  

Property and equipment

     685,515       662,948  

Less – accumulated depreciation and amortization

     353,633       329,177  
                

Property and equipment, net

     331,882       333,771  
                

Software, net of accumulated amortization

     41,313       45,509  

Goodwill

     477,291       472,401  

Purchased software licenses, net of accumulated amortization

     161,814       155,518  

Unbilled and notes receivable, excluding current portions

     17,188       19,139  

Deferred costs, net of accumulated amortization

     116,651       112,817  

Data acquisition costs, net of accumulated amortization

     38,712       40,828  

Other assets, net

     21,379       21,662  
                
   $ 1,545,047     $ 1,540,498  
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     

Current liabilities:

    

Current installments of long-term obligations

   $ 96,701     $ 93,518  

Trade accounts payable

     41,905       44,144  

Accrued expenses:

    

Payroll

     27,487       32,139  

Other

     79,345       81,428  

Income taxes

     9,759       4,845  

Deferred revenue

     112,313       123,916  

Dividends payable

     4,403       —    
                

Total current liabilities

     371,913       379,990  
                

Long-term obligations:

    

Long-term debt and capital leases, net of current installments

     345,992       353,692  

Software and data licenses, net of current installments

     28,854       22,723  
                

Total long-term obligations

     374,846       376,415  
                

Deferred income taxes

     77,735       77,916  

Commitments and contingencies (note 11)

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Common stock

     10,985       10,946  

Additional paid-in capital

     683,350       677,026  

Unearned share-based compensation

     —         (1,941 )

Retained earnings

     423,683       410,278  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     8,637       2,205  

Treasury stock, at cost

     (406,102 )     (392,337 )
                

Total stockholders’ equity

     720,553       706,177  
                
   $ 1,545,047     $ 1,540,498  
                

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

    

For the Three Months ended

June 30

 
     2006     2005  

Revenue:

    

Services

   $ 261,892     $ 238,499  

Data

     74,813       71,772  
                

Total revenue

     336,705       310,271  

Operating costs and expenses:

    

Cost of revenue

    

Services

     196,073       194,349  

Data

     49,572       48,885  
                

Total cost of revenue

     245,645       243,234  

Selling, general and administrative

     54,745       53,700  

Gains, losses and other items, net

     —         (1,637 )
                

Total operating costs and expenses

     300,390       295,297  
                

Income from operations

     36,315       14,974  
                

Other income (expense):

    

Interest expense

     (7,769 )     (5,162 )

Other, net

     647       891  
                

Total other income (expense)

     (7,122 )     (4,271 )
                

Earnings before income taxes

     29,193       10,703  

Income taxes

     11,385       4,064  
                

Net earnings

   $ 17,808     $ 6,639  
                

Earnings per share:

    

Basic

   $ 0.20     $ 0.07  
                

Diluted

   $ 0.20     $ 0.07  
                

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006

(Unaudited)

((Dollars in thousands)

 

     Common Stock   

Additional

paid-in
capital

   

Unearned

share-based
compensation

   

Comprehensive
income (loss)

  

Retained
earnings

   

Accumulated
other

comprehensive
income (loss)

   Treasury stock    

Total

stockholders’
equity

 
    

Number

of shares

   Amount               

Number

of shares

    Amount    

Balances at March 31, 2006

   109,458,152    $ 10,946    $ 677,026     $ (1,941 )      $ 410,278     $ 2,205    (21,309,622 )   $ (392,337 )   $ 706,177  

Employee stock awards, benefit plans and other issuances

   392,515      39      6,730       —       $ —        —         —      300       4       6,773  

Tax benefit of stock options and warrants exercised

   —        —        1,079       —         —        —         —      —         —         1,079  

Implementation of SFAS 123R (note 3)

   —        —        (1,941 )     1,941       —        —         —      —         —         —    

Non-cash share-based compensation

   —        —        553       —         —        —         —      —         —         553  

Warrant exercise

   —        —        (97 )     —         —        —         —      6,792       97       —    

Dividends

   —        —        —         —         —        (4,403 )     —      —         —         (4,403 )

Acquisition of treasury stock

   —        —        —         —         —        —         —      (575,970 )     (13,866 )     (13,866 )

Comprehensive income:

                        

Foreign currency translation

   —        —        —         —         6,308      —         6,308    —         —         6,308  

Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax

   —        —        —         —         124      —         124    —         —         124  

Net earnings

   —        —        —         —         17,808      17,808       —      —         —         17,808  
                                                                        

Total comprehensive income

             $ 24,240            
                            

Balances at June 30, 2006

   109,850,667    $ 10,985    $ 683,350     $ —          $ 423,683     $ 8,637    (21,878,500 )   $ (406,102 )   $ 720,553  
                                                                    

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

 

5


ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

 

     For the Three Months ended
June 30
 
     2006     2005  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net earnings

   $ 17,808     $ 6,639  

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation, amortization and impairment of long-lived assets

     59,047       55,534  

Loss (gain) on disposal or impairment of assets, net

     (84 )     43  

Deferred income taxes

     (233 )     3,635  

Non-cash share-based compensation expense

     553       298  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable, net

     (1,796 )     17,297  

Other assets

     3,186       (17,945 )

Accounts payable and other liabilities

     (9,743 )     917  

Deferred revenue

     (12,388 )     (4,942 )
                

Net cash provided by operating activities

     56,350       61,476  
                

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Payments received from investments

     783       721  

Capitalized software development costs

     (5,719 )     (5,673 )

Capital expenditures

     (217 )     (2,929 )

Cash collected from the sale and license of software

     5,000       —    

Deferral of costs and data acquisition costs

     (16,887 )     (16,192 )

Net cash paid in acquisitions

     —         (106,719 )
                

Net cash used in investing activities

     (17,040 )     (130,792 )
                

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Proceeds from debt

     28,873       281,706  

Payments of debt

     (67,866 )     (54,130 )

Dividends paid

     —         (4,432 )

Sale of common stock

     6,773       13,527  

Acquisition of treasury stock

     (11,965 )     (160,354 )

Tax benefit of stock options exercised

     1,079       —    
                

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     (43,106 )     76,317  
                

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

     254       (297 )
                

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (3,542 )     6,704  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     7,705       4,185  
                

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 4,163     $ 10,889  
                

 

6


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

 

     For the Three Months ended
June 30
     2006    2005

Supplemental cash flow information:

     

Cash paid during the period for:

     

Interest

   $ 7,830    $ 4,397

Income taxes

     5,268      190

Payments on capital leases and installment payment arrangements

     18,905      19,929

Payments on software and data license liabilities

     7,847      10,938

Other debt payments, excluding line of credit

     1,711      1,357

Noncash investing and financing activities:

     

Issuance of options for acquisitions

     —        7,541

Enterprise software licenses acquired under software obligation

     15,266      2,161

Acquisition of property and equipment under capital leases and installment payment arrangements

     19,426      26,458

Construction and other financing

     5,904      3,654

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7


ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Basis of presentation

These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Acxiom Corporation (“Registrant”, “Acxiom” or “the Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “the Commission”). In the opinion of the Registrant’s management all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods included have been made and the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Certain note information has been omitted because it has not changed significantly from that reflected in notes 1 through 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of Item 8 of the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (“2006 Annual Report”), as filed with the Commission on June 14, 2006. This report and the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in connection with the 2006 Annual Report. The financial information contained in this report is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other period or for the full fiscal year ending March 31, 2007.

Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements are complex and require management to make judgments and/or significant estimates regarding amounts reported or disclosed in these financial statements. Additionally, the application of certain of these accounting policies is governed by complex accounting principles and interpretations thereof. A discussion of the Company’s significant accounting principles and the application thereof is included in note 1 and in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, to the Company’s 2006 Annual Report.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on the prior year’s net earnings as previously reported.

Accounting change

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123R”) which requires compensation cost related to stock options and other share-based payments be recognized in the financial statements. The Company adopted SFAS 123R, effective April 1, 2006, using the modified prospective transition method and, therefore, has not restated results for prior periods. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost must be recognized for all share-based payments granted after the adoption of SFAS 123R and for all awards granted prior to the adoption date which remain unvested on the adoption date. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, and prior to adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company accelerated vesting of substantially all unvested options. Remaining unvested share-based compensation granted prior to April 1, 2006 relates to options granted to outside directors which were not accelerated, options held by certain terminated associates that will be forfeited or cancelled with the passage of time, options issued as a result of the DI acquisition (see note 4), and restricted stock units granted during fiscal 2006.

New accounting pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”) in June, 2006. FIN 48 requires a company to use a more-likely-than-not standard in recognizing the benefit of a position taken in a tax return. FIN 48 will be effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2007. Any adjustment required by the implementation of FIN 48 will be reflected as an adjustment to the balance of retained earnings as a change in accounting principle. The Company has not yet assessed the impact of applying FIN 48 to its tax positions.

 

8


2. EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

Earnings Per Share -

A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted earnings per share is shown below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

     For the quarter ended
June 30
     2006    2005

Basic earnings per share:

     

Numerator – net earnings

   $ 17,808    $ 6,639

Denominator – weighted-average shares outstanding

     88,155      91,044
             

Basic earnings per share

   $ 0.20    $ 0.07
             

Diluted earnings per share:

     

Numerator – net earnings

   $ 17,808    $ 6,639
             

Denominator:

     

Weighted-average shares outstanding

     88,155      91,044

Dilutive effect of common stock options, warrants, and restricted stock as computed under the treasury stock method

     2,268      2,752
             
     90,423      93,796
             

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.20    $ 0.07
             

At June 30, 2006, the Company had options and warrants outstanding providing for the purchase of approximately 14.2 million shares of common stock. Options and warrants that were outstanding during the periods presented, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares are shown below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

    

For the quarter ended

June 30

     2006    2005

Number of shares outstanding under options and warrants

     3,391      8,147
             

Range of exercise prices

   $ 24.52-$268.55    $ 19.58-$268.55
             

Stockholders’ Equity

The Company declared dividends on its common stock in the amount of $0.05 per share in each of the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005. The dividend declared in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was paid in July 2006.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, 0.6 million shares were repurchased pursuant to the Company’s common stock repurchase program for an aggregate purchase price of $13.9 million. Cash paid for repurchases differs from the aggregate purchase price due to trades at the end of the current and prior quarter, which were settled shortly after the end of their respective purchase periods. Cash paid for repurchases in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $12.0 million. At June 30, 2006, the maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the program is $146.0 million.

 

9


3. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION:

New Accounting Pronouncement

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R as originally issued required adoption by the Company in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Subsequent to issuance of the statement, the effective date was delayed until the beginning of the next fiscal year, which began April 1, 2006.

SFAS 123R requires the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments (including stock options) based on the grant-date fair value of the award to be recognized in the statement of earnings over the service period of the award. Prior to April 1, 2006 the Company accounted for its stock options under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations, under which no compensation cost had been historically recognized by the Company for any of its stock options except for certain in-the-money stock options issued as a result of the DI acquisition. SFAS 123R supersedes Opinion No. 25 and eliminates the use of the intrinsic value method previously used by the Company.

Changes in Share-based Compensation

Historical Share-based Compensation

When the Company first began granting premium-priced options in 1993, the options had vesting periods of nine years and were granted one-fourth at market value, one-fourth at a 50% premium over market, and one-half at a 100% premium over market. In 1997, in order to make the plan more competitive, the compensation committee changed the percentages so that one-half of all long-term incentive (“LTI”) grants were made at market, with one-fourth at a 50% premium over market, and with one-fourth at a 100% premium over market. In 1999, again to address the competitiveness of the plan, the committee changed the premium levels so that one-half of the LTI grants were made at market, with one-fourth being made at a 25% premium over market, and one-fourth at a 50% premium over market. Also in 1999, the Company changed the vesting period from nine to six years. In fiscal 2004 the Company ceased issuing premium-priced options and issued all subsequent option grants at the market price on the date of issue.

The Company’s intent in implementing the original 1993 stock option program as well as the subsequent versions of the program was to align its leaders’ interest with stockholders’ interests, and to motivate, retain and attract key leaders. The Company believes that this goal was achieved through the implementation of premium-priced options and long vesting periods, which are substantially longer than the vesting periods used at most companies. However, as a result of SFAS 123R, the Company would have been required to recognize expense for options granted a number of years earlier. In fact, SFAS 123R would have required the Company to recognize expense for options granted as far back as 1997.

Accelerated Vesting

During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, the compensation committee of the board of directors voted to vest the unvested 2.1 million options which were then out of the money with option prices greater than $22.33. Then during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the board of directors authorized the acceleration of vesting of all of the Company’s outstanding unvested stock options except for those granted to the outside directors of the Company and except for those held by terminated associates which will be forfeited or cancelled with the passage of time. The accelerated vesting was effective at the close of business on March 24, 2005. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq National Market Quotation System used for measurement of compensation as of the date of acceleration was $21.37. As a result of the acceleration, options to purchase approximately 4.9 million shares of the Company’s common stock, which otherwise would have vested from time to time over the following six years, became fully vested. All other terms and conditions applicable to these stock option grants remain in effect.

The decision to accelerate the vesting of these options was made primarily to avoid recognizing compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations in future financial statements upon the adoption of SFAS 123R. By accelerating the vesting of these options, the Company recognized approximately $3.6 million of compensation expense in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. The Company believes that the acceleration of vesting eliminated the need for recognizing future compensation expense, in either the financial statements or the pro forma footnote disclosure, of approximately $11.7 million in fiscal 2006; $11.2 million in fiscal 2007; $8.2 million in fiscal 2008; and a total of $6.5 million over the following three fiscal years. The expenses which otherwise would have been incurred but for the acceleration are reported in the Company’s fiscal year 2005 financial statements in the pro forma footnote disclosure as permitted under the provisions of SFAS 123 prior to its revision.

 

10


Changes in Share-based Compensation Plan

At the 2005 annual meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved revisions to its share-based compensation plan. Under the revised plan, other forms of equity compensation, such as restricted stock and restricted stock units, are available for grant under the plan. These alternatives are currently expected to be utilized as the Company’s primary LTI vehicle in amounts which should result in significantly less dilution than the former LTI stock option program. The Company will continue to evaluate all applicable accounting standards with regard to the future implementation of its LTI strategies.

Adoption of FAS 123R

The Company adopted SFAS 123R, effective April 1, 2006, using the modified prospective transition method and therefore has not restated results for prior periods. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost must be recognized for all share-based payments granted after the adoption of SFAS 123R and for all awards granted prior to the adoption date which remain unvested on the adoption date. As discussed above, substantially all of the Company’s existing options were vested prior to adoption of SFAS 123R.

Share-based Compensation Plans

Options and Equity Compensation

The Company has stock option plans and equity compensation plans (collectively referred to as the “share-based plans”) administered by the compensation committee of the board of directors under which options and restricted stock were outstanding as of June 30, 2006.

The Company has reserved 30.1 million shares of the Company’s common stock for awards pursuant to the Company’s share-based plans of which approximately 1.6 million shares were available for grant at June 30, 2006.

The Company’s 2005 Equity Compensation Plan provides that all associates ( employees, officers, directors, affiliates, independent contractors or consultants) are eligible to receive awards (grant of any option, stock appreciation right, restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award, performance awards, performance share, performance unit, qualified performance-based award, or other stock unit award) pursuant to the plan with the terms and conditions applicable to an award set forth in applicable grant documents. While restricted stock and/or restricted stock units will likely be the primary LTI vehicle going forward, some stock options may be granted for recruiting and/or retention purposes. The compensation committee of the board of directors will continue to take external market and regulatory developments into consideration when determining the Company’s LTI practices and may further update its guidelines so as to better align share-based compensation with the Company’s business strategies and with stockholder interests.

Incentive stock option awards granted pursuant to the share-based plans cannot be granted with an exercise price less than 100% of the per-share market value of the Company’s shares at the date of grant and have a maximum duration of ten years from the date of grant. Board policy has required that nonqualified options be priced at or above the fair market value of the common stock at the time of grant with a maximum duration of twelve years.

Restricted stock units may be issued pursuant to the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan and represent the right to receive shares in the future by way of an award agreement which includes vesting provisions. Award agreements can further provide for forfeitures triggered by certain prohibited activities, such as breach of confidentiality. All restricted stock units will be expensed over the vesting period as adjusted for estimated forfeitures.

The Company receives income tax deductions as a result of the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock units. Under the provisions of SFAS 123R, the tax benefit of share-based compensation expense in excess of the book compensation expense is reflected as a financing cash inflow and an operating cash outflow included in changes in operating assets and liabilities. The Company has elected the short-cut method in accounting for the tax benefits of share-based payment awards.

Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In addition to the share-based plans, the Company maintains a qualified employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) that permits substantially all employees to purchase shares of common stock at 85% of the market price. The number of shares available for issuance at June 30, 2006 was approximately 1.9 million. Approximately 45,800 shares were purchased under the ESPP during the three months ended June 30, 2006. The total expense to the Company in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 for the discount to the market price was approximately $0.2 million.

 

11


Pro-forma Earnings Per Share

Prior to April 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its stock options under the intrinsic value provisions of APB 25. As a result of the acquisition of DI (note 4) in fiscal 2006, the Company issued options to DI associates that are in-the-money, resulting in compensation cost under APB 25. Had compensation cost for options granted been determined on the basis of the fair value of the awards at the date of grant, consistent with the methodology prescribed by SFAS 123 prior to its revision, the Company’s consolidated net earnings would have been reduced to the following unaudited pro forma amounts for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

     For the quarter ended
June 30, 2005
 

Net earnings, as reported

   $ 6,639  

Plus: share-based employee compensation expense included in determination of net income, net of income tax benefit

     185  

Less: share-based employee compensation expense under fair value based method, net of income tax benefit

     (490 )
        

Pro forma net earnings

   $ 6,334  
        

Earnings per share:

  

Basic – as reported

   $ 0.07  
        

Basic – pro forma

   $ 0.07  
        

Diluted – as reported

   $ 0.07  
        

Diluted – pro forma

   $ 0.07  
        

Stock Option Activity

There were no stock options granted in the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The per-share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $3.45 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of 1.1%; risk-free interest rate of 3.8%; expected option life of 3 years and expected volatility of 23%.

Option activity for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was as follows:

 

     Number of
shares
   

Weighted-average
exercise price

per share

   Weighted-average
remaining
contractual term
(in years)
  

Aggregate
intrinsic value

(in thousands)

Outstanding at March 31, 2006

   13,058,191     $ 20.91      

Exercised

   (247,269 )   $ 14.35       $ 2,766

Forfeited or cancelled

   (69,940 )   $ 27.49      
                  

Outstanding at June 30, 2006

   12,740,982     $ 21.00    9.12    $ 51,009
                  

Exercisable at June 30, 2006

   12,524,057     $ 21.19    9.13    $ 47,683
                  

Non-vested stock options as of March 31, 2006 and changes during the three-month period ended June 30, 2006 were as follows:

 

     Number
of shares
   

Weighted-average
exercise price

per share

   Weighted-average
remaining
contractual term
(in years)
  

Aggregate
intrinsic value

(in thousands)

Outstanding at March 31, 2006

   268,810     $ 9.88      

Vested

   (29,523 )   $ 9.11      

Forfeited or cancelled

   (22,362 )   $ 12.88      
                  

Outstanding at June 30, 2006

   216,925     $ 9.67    8.20    $ 3,326
                  

 

12


The aggregate intrinsic value in the tables above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between Acxiom’s closing stock price on the last trading day of its first quarter of fiscal 2007 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had vested option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2006. This amount changes based upon changes in the fair market value of Acxiom’s stock.

Following is a summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2006:

 

     Options outstanding    Options exercisable

Range of exercise price per share

   Options
outstanding
   Weighted-average
remaining
contractual life
  

Weighted-average
exercise price

per share

   Options
exercisable
  

Weighted-average
exercise price

per share

$ 0.11 - $ 9.62

   268,841    7.58 years    $ 6.39    124,336    $ 5.70

$ 10.17 - $ 14.68

   2,370,631    9.86 years    $ 12.26    2,321,320    $ 12.24

$ 15.00 - $ 19.82

   3,202,897    8.93 years    $ 16.57    3,183,930    $ 16.56

$ 20.12 - $ 24.53

   4,057,696    9.76 years    $ 22.81    4,053,554    $ 22.81

$ 25.43 - $ 29.30

   1,587,584    8.14 years    $ 26.68    1,587,584    $ 26.68

$ 30.93 - $ 39.12

   912,754    7.62 years    $ 35.71    912,754    $ 35.71

$ 40.50 - $ 75.55

   334,630    7.94 years    $ 44.75    334,630    $ 44.75

$168.61 - $268.55

   5,949    3.66 years    $ 197.60    5,949    $ 197.60
                            
   12,740,982    9.12 years    $ 21.00    12,524,057    $ 21.19
                            

Total expense related to stock options for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was approximately $0.3 million. Future expense for these options is expected to be approximately $1.9 million over the next three years.

Restricted Stock Unit Activity

Non-vested restricted stock units as of March 31, 2006 and changes during the three-month period ended June 30, 2006 were as follows:

 

     Number
of shares
  

Weighted average
fair value at
grant date

(in thousands)

   Weighted-average
remaining
contractual term
(in years)

Outstanding at March 31, 2006

   75,000    $ 1,565    3.34

Granted

   25,000    $ 595    3.87
              

Outstanding at June 30, 2006

   100,000    $ 2,160    3.48
              

During fiscal 2006, the Company issued restricted stock units covering 75,000 shares of common stock with a value at the date of grant of $1.6 million. During the three months ending June 30, 2006 the Company issued restricted stock units covering 25,000 shares of common stock with a value at the date of grant of $0.6 million. The value at the date of grant is determined by reference to quoted market prices for the shares, less a small calculated discount to reflect the fact that the restricted shares do not pay dividends until they are vested. Restricted stock units vest in equal annual increments over four years. The expense related to restricted stock in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $0.1 million. Future expense for these restricted stock units is expected to be approximately $1.9 million over the next four years.

 

13


4. ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES:

In August 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of InsightAmerica, Inc. (“IA”), a privately held company based in Broomfield, Colorado. IA specializes in fraud prevention and risk mitigation services. The Company paid approximately $34.6 million in cash for IA, net of cash acquired, and not including amounts, if any, payable pursuant to the terms and conditions of an earnout agreement. The Company paid an additional $2.4 million during the quarter ending December 31, 2005 relating to the earnout agreement. Under the provisions of the earnout agreement, the Company may pay up to an additional $7.6 million based on IA’s achievement of certain quarterly revenue and earnings targets over the period ending December 31, 2006. IA’s results of operations are included in the Company’s consolidated results beginning August 1, 2005. IA’s total annual revenues for their fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 were approximately $18 million. The Company has omitted pro forma disclosure related to this acquisition as the pro forma effect of this acquisition is not material to the Company’s consolidated results for any of the periods presented.

In May 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of Digital Impact, Inc. (“DI”). DI is a provider of integrated digital marketing solutions and is based in San Mateo, California. Management believes DI provides the Company with new capabilities that are complementary to the Company’s existing service offerings. The Company paid approximately $106.9 million in cash for DI, net of cash acquired. DI’s results of operations are included in the Company’s consolidated results beginning May 1, 2005. DI’s total annual revenues were approximately $45 million at the date of purchase. The Company has omitted pro forma disclosure related to this acquisition as the pro forma effect of this acquisition is not material to the Company’s consolidated results for any of the periods presented.

The following table shows the allocation of IA and DI purchase prices to assets acquired and liabilities assumed (dollars in thousands):

 

     IA    DI

Assets acquired:

     

Cash

   $ 541    $ 27,025

Goodwill

     29,085      101,360

Other intangible assets

     7,000      20,800

Other current and noncurrent assets

     6,716      14,390
             
     43,342      163,575

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and capital leases assumed

     5,850      17,317
             

Net assets acquired

     37,492      146,258

Less:

     

Cash acquired

     541      27,025

Issuance of vested stock options

     —        7,541

Payments to be made for restricted stock

     —        4,768
             

Net cash paid

   $ 36,951    $ 106,924
             

The purchase price allocation for the IA acquisition is subject to adjustment as the Company makes the final determination of the fair values assigned to assets and liabilities acquired.

The amounts allocated to other intangible assets in the table above include software, customer relationship intangibles, and databases. None of the amounts allocated to goodwill or other intangible assets are deductible for tax purposes.

 

14


As a result of the DI acquisition and the Claritas Europe and Consodata acquisitions in fiscal 2004 and 2005, management formulated plans to consolidate certain facilities, eliminate duplicative operations, and terminate or relocate certain associates. The Company recorded aggregate accruals in other accrued liabilities for the estimated costs of the integration process, including lease termination costs, costs of terminating or relocating associates, and for other contract termination costs. The table below shows adjustments and payments related to these accruals during the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Any future adjustments to these plans may result in future expense or in a decrease to the goodwill recorded for the acquisitions.

 

(dollars in thousands)    Associate-related
reserves
    Lease and related
reserves
    Other contract
termination reserves
    Total  

Balance at March 31, 2006

   $ 1,161     $ 4,879     $ 1,283     $ 7,323  

Payments

     (340 )     (1,914 )     (34 )     (2,288 )

Change in foreign currency translation adjustment

     23       168       58       249  
                                

Balance at June 30, 2006

   $ 844     $ 3,133     $ 1,307     $ 5,284  
                                

The associate-related reserves are expected to be paid during the current fiscal year. The remaining items will be paid over approximately the next two years, through April 2008.

Gains, Losses and Other Items

During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company terminated the lease on an airplane which was then sold by the lessor. Under the terms of the lease, the Company was entitled to the proceeds of the airplane sale, net of the payoff value of the lease. As a result of this lease termination, the Company received net proceeds of $1.6 million which is included in Gains, losses, and other items, net.

5. OTHER CURRENT AND NONCURRENT ASSETS:

Unbilled and notes receivable are from the sales of software, data licenses, and equipment and from the sale of divested operations, net of the current portions of such receivables. Other current assets include the current portion of the unbilled and notes receivable of $8.7 million and $8.2 million at June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively. Except as disclosed below, there are no allowances recorded against any of the unbilled and notes receivable (dollars in thousands).

 

     June 30,
2006
   March 31,
2006

Notes receivable from DMI, net of future credits of $0.6 million at June 30, 2006 and $0.7 million at March 31, 2006

   $ 1,972    $ 1,988

Notes receivable from other divestitures

     3,736      4,005
             

Notes receivable from divestitures

     5,708      5,993

Less current portion

     832      683
             

Long-term portion

     4,876      5,310
             

Unbilled and notes receivable arising from operations

     20,155      21,387

Less current portion

     7,843      7,558
             

Long-term portion

     12,312      13,829
             

Unbilled and notes receivable, excluding current portions

   $ 17,188    $ 19,139
             

 

15


Other current assets consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2006
   March 31,
2006

Current portion of unbilled and notes receivable

   $ 8,675    $ 8,241

Prepaid expenses

     19,851      20,896

Non-trade receivables

     1,905      1,143

Other miscellaneous assets

     14,773      14,657
             

Other current assets

   $ 45,204    $ 44,937
             

Other noncurrent assets consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2006
   March 31,
2006

Investments in marketable and nonmarketable securities

   $ 4,521    $ 4,949

Acquired intangible assets, net

     13,154      13,849

Other miscellaneous noncurrent assets

     3,704      2,864
             

Other assets

   $ 21,379    $ 21,662
             

The acquired intangible assets noted above include customer relationship intangibles acquired through purchase acquisitions, net of accumulated amortization.

6. GOODWILL:

Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair values of net assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill is reviewed at least annually for impairment under a two-part test. Impairment exists to the extent that the reporting unit’s recorded goodwill exceeds the residual fair value assigned to such goodwill. Any impairment that results from the completion of the two-part test is recorded as a charge to operations during the period in which the impairment test is completed. Completion of the Company’s most recent annual impairment test during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 indicated that no potential impairment of its goodwill balances existed as of April 1, 2006.

The carrying amount of goodwill, by business segment, for the three months ended June 30, 2006 is presented in the following table.

 

(dollars in thousands)    US Services
and Data
   International
Services and Data
   Total

Balance at March 31, 2006

   $ 344,877    $ 127,524    $ 472,401

Purchase adjustments

     458      —        458

Change in foreign currency translation adjustment

     —        4,432      4,432
                    

Balance at June 30, 2006

   $ 345,335    $ 131,956    $ 477,291
                    

 

16


7. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS:

Long-term obligations consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2006
   March 31,
2006

Revolving credit agreement

   $ 241,742    $ 252,272

Capital leases and installment payment obligations on land, buildings and equipment payable in monthly payments of principal plus interest at rates ranging from approximately 3% to 8%; remaining terms up to fifteen years

     124,428      123,907

Warrants

     1,827      1,911

Other debt and long-term liabilities

     48,191      43,903
             

Total long-term debt and capital leases

     416,188      421,993

Less current installments

     70,196      68,301
             

Long-term debt, excluding current installments

   $ 345,992    $ 353,692
             

Software license liabilities payable over terms up to seven years; effective interest rates ranging from approximately 4% to 8%

   $ 55,359    $ 47,940

Less current installments

     26,505      25,217
             

License liabilities, excluding current installments

   $ 28,854    $ 22,723
             

Effective September 2, 2005, the Company amended and restated its revolving credit facility to allow for revolving borrowings and letters of credit of up to $500 million through March 31, 2010. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility of $241.7 million at June 30, 2006 and $252.3 million at March 31, 2006 bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.0% or at an alternative base rate or at the federal funds rate plus 2.0%, depending upon the type of borrowing, and are secured by accounts receivable. Weighted average interest rates on the June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 borrowings under the revolving credit facility were 6.19% and 5.72%, respectively. Outstanding letters of credit at both June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 were $4.0 million.

Under the terms of certain of the above borrowings, the Company is required to maintain certain debt-to-cash flow and debt service coverage ratios, among other restrictions. At June 30, 2006, the Company was in compliance with these covenants and restrictions. In addition, if certain financial ratios and other conditions are not satisfied, the revolving credit facility limits the Company’s ability to pay dividends in excess of $30 million in any fiscal year (plus additional amounts in certain circumstances). The company is currently not under any dividend limitation.

 

17


8. ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS:

Trade accounts receivable are presented net of allowances for doubtful accounts, returns and credits of $8.4 million and $8.5 million at June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively.

9. SEGMENT INFORMATION:

The Company reports segment information consistent with the way management internally disaggregates its operations to assess performance and to allocate resources. The Company’s business segments consist of US Services and Data and International Services and Data. Both US and International segments include consulting, database and data warehousing, list processing services, the Company’s data content and software products. US Services and Data also includes information technology outsourcing and facilities management for data center management, network management, client/server management and other complementary IT services. The Company evaluates performance of the segments based on segment operating income, which excludes certain gains, losses and other items.

Substantially all of the nonrecurring and impairment charges incurred by the Company have been recorded in Corporate and other, since the Company does not hold the individual segments responsible for these charges. The following tables present information by business segment (dollars in thousands):

 

     For the quarter ended
June 30
 
     2006    2005  

Revenue:

     

US Services and Data

   $ 291,419    $ 265,434  

International Services and Data

     45,286      44,837  
               

Total revenue

   $ 336,705    $ 310,271  
               

Income from operations:

     

US Services and Data

   $ 35,950    $ 14,717  

International Services and Data

     365      (1,380 )

Corporate and other

     —        1,637  
               

Income from operations

   $ 36,315    $ 14,974  
               

10. RESTRUCTURING, IMPAIRMENT AND OTHER CHARGES:

As discussed in Restructuring Plans below, the following table shows the balances that were accrued for restructuring plans as well as the changes in those balances during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

 

     Associate-related
reserves
    Ongoing
contract costs
    Other accruals    Total  

Balance at March 31, 2006

   $ 1,207     $ 1,743     $ 259    $ 3,209  

Payments

     (325 )     (21 )     —        (346 )
                               

Balance at June 30, 2006

   $ 882     $ 1,722     $ 259    $ 2,863  
                               

Restructuring Plans

During the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded a total of $13.0 million in restructuring and other impairment charges included in gains, losses and other items in the consolidated statement of operations. The charges included $6.8 million in severance and other associate-related reserves for payments to be made to approximately 160 associates who were notified during the quarter that they were to be involuntarily terminated; $3.7 million in lease termination costs or costs to be incurred after exiting certain leased facilities; and $2.5 million in other costs including the write-off of certain non-productive assets and other contract termination costs. The table above shows the portion of the above charges which are yet to be paid as of June 30, 2006 (dollars in thousands). The remaining accrued costs are expected to be paid out over the terms of the related leases or contracts, of which the longest one runs through fiscal 2012.

 

18


11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

Legal Matters

On June 23, 2005, a class action lawsuit was filed against the board of directors alleging breach of fiduciary duty. Among other things, the putative class action plaintiff alleges that the board members are not independent from Charles Morgan. Based on this purported lack of independence, the lawsuit alleges that the board did not use good faith in considering the June 3, 2005 letter from ValueAct.

The lawsuit, Indiana State District Council of Laborers and HOD Carriers Pension Fund v. Morgan, et al., CV05-8498, is pending in Pulaski County, Arkansas Circuit Court. In addition to seeking class action status, the plaintiffs are also seeking an order requiring the defendants to properly consider the ValueAct transaction or any other transaction in the best interests of Acxiom shareholders and to rescind any measures that would prevent ValueAct from negotiating for the purchase of the Company. The complaint has been amended numerous times and the defendants have filed a comprehensive response seeking dismissal of the action and are vigorously contesting the lawsuit. The Company does not believe the ultimate outcome of the lawsuit will have a material impact on the Company or its operations or financial position.

April Bell v. Acxiom Corporation (U.S. District Court, E.D., Arkansas, 4-06-CV-0485) is a class action lawsuit case filed April 17, 2006. It alleges that Acxiom had a duty to notify consumers of the security breach incidents that occurred in 2003. Among other things, the complaint seeks an order requiring Acxiom to notify all class members in writing of the times their private information was breached, how it was breached, by whom, and what action Acxiom has taken to prevent further breaches of security. The plaintiff also seeks an order requiring Acxiom to remove the class members’ private information from its computer systems and enjoining Acxiom from obtaining such private information from the class in the future. The complaint also seeks compensatory and punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees. The Company believes the case is without merit and intends to defend the case vigorously, including by filing a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted.

Linda Brooks and Richard Fresco v. Auto Data Direct, Inc., et al., (U.S. Dist. Court, S.D. Florida, 03-61063) is a putative class action lawsuit, removed to federal court in May, 2003, filed against Acxiom and several other information providers. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants obtained and used drivers license data in violation of the federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act. To date, a class has not been certified. Among other things, the plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorneys’ fees. The Company is defending the case vigorously on both the facts and the law and believes that it has acted in conformity with the applicable law.

In the opinion of management, none of the above cases will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of all of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Commitments

The Company leases data processing equipment, software, office furniture and equipment, land and office space under noncancellable operating leases. Additionally, the Company has entered into synthetic operating leases for computer equipment, furniture and aircraft (“Leased Assets”). These synthetic operating lease facilities are accounted for as operating leases under generally accepted accounting principles and are treated as capital leases for income tax reporting purposes. Initial lease terms under the synthetic computer equipment and furniture facility range from two to six years, with the Company having the option at expiration of the initial lease to return the equipment, purchase the equipment at a fixed price, or extend the term of the lease. During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company terminated one of two aircraft leases and the lessor sold the aircraft. Under the terms of the lease the Company was entitled to the proceeds of the sale, net of the payoff value of the lease. As a result of the lease termination the Company received net proceeds of $1.6 million which is recorded in gains, losses and other items.

The total amount drawn under these synthetic operating lease facilities since inception was $228.9 million and the Company has a future commitment for lease payments of $17.6 million over the next five years. In the event the Company elects to return the Leased Assets, the Company has guaranteed a portion of the residual value to the lessors. Assuming the Company elects to return the Leased Assets to the lessors at its earliest opportunity under the synthetic lease arrangements and assuming the Leased Assets have no significant residual value to the lessors, the maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these residual value guarantees was $5.4 million at June 30, 2006.

 

19


The Company also has an aircraft leased from a business controlled by an officer and director of the Company. Should the Company elect early termination rights under the lease or not extend the lease beyond the initial term and the lessor sells the aircraft, the Company has guaranteed a residual value of 70% of the then outstanding indebtedness of the lessor, or $3.0 million at June 30, 2006.

In connection with certain of the Company’s facilities, the Company has entered into 50/50 joint ventures with local real estate developers. In each case, the Company is guaranteeing portions of the loans for the buildings. In addition, in connection with the disposal of certain assets, the Company has guaranteed loans for the buyers of the assets. These guarantees were made by the Company primarily to facilitate favorable financing terms for those third parties. Should the third parties default on this indebtedness, the Company would be required to perform under its guarantee. Substantially all of the third-party indebtedness is collateralized by various pieces of real property. At June 30, 2006 the Company’s maximum potential future payments under all of these guarantees of third-party indebtedness were $5.2 million.

 

20


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction and Overview

Acxiom Corporation (“Acxiom” or “the Company”) integrates data, services and technology to create and deliver customer and information management solutions for many of the largest and most respected companies in the world. The core components of Acxiom’s innovative solutions are customer data integration (“CDI”) technology and services, data, database services, information technology (“IT”) outsourcing, consulting and analytics, and privacy leadership. Founded in 1969, Acxiom is headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, with locations throughout the United States (“US”) and Europe, and in Australia and China.

Highlights of the quarter ended June 30, 2006 are identified below.

 

    Revenue of $336.7 million, up 8.5 percent from $310.3 million in the first fiscal quarter a year ago.

 

    Income from operations of $36.3 million, a 143 percent increase compared to $15.0 million in the first fiscal quarter last year.

 

    Pre-tax earnings of $29.2 million, up 173 percent from $10.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006.

 

    Diluted earnings per share of $0.20, a 186 percent increase compared to $0.07 in the first fiscal quarter last year.

 

    Operating cash flow of $56.4 million and free cash flow available to equity of $11.9 million. The free cash flow available to equity of $11.9 million is a non-GAAP financial measure which is discussed in Capital Resources and Liquidity.

 

    Services gross margin increased to 25.1 percent from 18.5 percent in the same quarter last fiscal year and from 23.7 percent in the sequential quarter ended March 31, 2006.

 

    Computer, communications and other equipment expense continued to decline as a percentage of revenue. This key performance metric fell to 21.7 percent versus 25 percent in the first quarter last fiscal year.

 

    The repurchase of 576,000 shares of Acxiom stock through the Company’s stock buy-back program at a total cost of $13.9 million.

The highlights above are intended to identify to the reader some of the more significant events and transactions of the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2006. However, these highlights are not intended to be a full discussion of the Company’s results for the quarter. These highlights should be read in conjunction with the following discussion of Results of Operations and Capital Resources and Liquidity and with the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and footnotes accompanying this report.

 

21


Results of Operations

A summary of selected financial information for each of the periods reported is presented below (dollars in millions, except per share amounts):

 

    

For the quarter ended

June 30

 
     2006    2005    % Change  

Revenue

        

Services

   $ 261.9    $ 238.5    9.8 %

Data

     74.8      71.8    4.2  
                    
   $ 336.7    $ 310.3    8.5 %

Total operating costs and expenses

     300.4      295.3    1.7  

Income from operations

     36.3      15.0    142.5  
                    

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.20    $ 0.07    185.7 %
                    

Revenues

Services revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $261.9 million. This represents a 23.4 million increase or 9.8%. International services accounted for approximately $0.5 million of the increase and the remainder was attributable to the US segment. Revenue generated from the Digital Impact and InsightAmerica acquisitions accounted for $12.4 million of the increase. Additionally, prior year results included approximately $1.6 million of revenue related to the disposed Melville print operations. US operations excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures accounted for the remaining revenue increase of $12.1 million. Approximately $4.2 million of this improvement was related to the turn-around of a troubled client relationship from the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, growth rates from the traditional services line of business and from the IT management line of business were both approximately 5.7% in the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

Data revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $74.8 million. This represents a $3.0 million increase or 4.2%. International data revenue was basically flat and, therefore, the growth for the quarter can be attributed to the US operations. Pass-through data revenue from the purchase of third-party data on behalf of a large client accounted for $1.7 million of the increase. (Pass-though data revenue is offset in cost of data, discussed below.) The remaining quarter-over-quarter increase was attributable to Acxiom’s US Infobase business which grew 5.0% when compared to the same quarter in the prior year.

The Company’s business segments consist of US Services and Data, and International Services and Data. Both segments include consulting, database and data warehousing, list processing services, the Company’s data content and software products. The US segment also includes information technology outsourcing and facilities management for data center management, network management, client/server management and other complementary IT services.

The following table shows the Company’s revenue by business segment for each of the three-month periods reported (dollars in millions):

 

    

For the quarter ended

June 30

 
     2006    2005    % Change  

US Services and Data

   $ 291.4    $ 265.4    9.8 %

International Services and Data

     45.3      44.9    1.0  
                    

Total Revenue

   $ 336.7    $ 310.3    8.5 %
                    

For the quarter ended June 30, 2006 US Services and Data revenue increased $26.0 million, or 9.8%, to $291.4 million compared to the same quarter a year ago. Net of acquisitions and divestitures discussed above, US Services and Data revenue increased $15.2 million or 5.9%.

Compared to the same quarter a year ago, International Services and Data revenue increased slightly (1.0%) to $45.3 million. Data revenue was flat in both Europe and Asia/Pacific. Services revenue was up slightly in Asia/ Pacific and Europe.

 

22


Operating Costs and Expenses

The following table presents the Company’s operating costs and expenses in categories for each of the periods presented (dollars in millions):

 

    

For the quarter ended

June 30

 
     2006    2005     % Change  

Salaries and benefits

   $ 135.9    $ 126.3     7.6 %

Computer, communications and other equipment

     73.1      77.7     (5.8 )

Data costs

     43.4      41.8     3.7  

Other operating costs and expenses

     48.0      51.1     (6.3 )

Gains, losses and other items, net

     —        (1.6 )   (100.0 )
                     

Total operating costs and expenses

   $ 300.4    $ 295.3     1.7 %
                     

The following table presents the Company’s operating costs and expenses for each of the periods presented (dollars in millions):

 

    

For the quarter ended

June 30

 
     2006    2005     % Change  

Cost of revenue

       

Services

   $ 196.1    $ 194.3     0.9 %

Data

     49.6      48.9     1.4  
                     

Total cost of revenue

   $ 245.7    $ 243.2     1.0 %

Selling, general and administrative

     54.7      53.7     1.9  

Gains, losses and other items, net

     —        (1.6 )   —    
                     

Total operating costs and expenses

   $ 300.4    $ 295.3     1.7 %
                     

 

     For the quarter ended
June 30
 
     2006     2005  

Gross profit margin

    

Services

   25.1 %   18.5 %

Data

   33.7     31.9  
            

Total gross profit margin

   27.0 %   21.6 %
            

Operating profit margin

   10.8 %   4.8 %
            

Cost of services revenue of $196.1 million represents an increase of $1.7 million compared to the same quarter a year ago. Gross margin for services revenue increased from 18.5% to 25.1%. This margin improvement can be attributed to the cost reduction program begun in the second quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. Examples of specific actions impacting services revenue margins include: 1) sale of the Melville print operation, 2) closing of the Japan operation, 3) international margin improvement initiatives 4) reduction of consulting expenses for services installations, and 5) headcount reductions. It should be noted that the impact of cost savings is offset by the impact of acquired businesses. The impact of acquisitions on the increase in cost of services is approximately $8.1 million.

Cost of data revenue of $49.6 million represents an increase of $0.7 million compared to the same quarter a year ago. Data revenue gross margins increased from 31.9% a year ago to 33.7% in this quarter. Pass-though data revenue and the related cost of data revenue was $20.3 million for the current quarter compared to $18.6 million for the prior year’s first quarter. Excluding the pass-through data and related costs, data costs actually decreased $1.1 million and margins on non-pass through data increased to 46.3% from 43.0% a year ago. This margin improvement can also be attributed to the cost reduction program, specifically the disposition of the real property data compilation operation.

 

23


Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses were $54.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. This represents a $1.0 million increase over the prior year same quarter. As a percent of total revenue, these expenses are 16.3% compared to 17.3% a year ago. Again, much of the reduction can be attributed to the cost reduction program. Items impacting SG&A include headcount reductions, benefit plan cost improvements, and the expense reductions related to the sale of a Company-owned aircraft. The impact of acquisitions on the increase in SG&A expense is approximately $1.5 million which offset the cost reductions noted above.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company terminated the lease on an airplane which was then sold by the lessor. Under the terms of the lease, the Company was entitled to the proceeds of the airplane sale, net of the payoff value of the lease. As a result of this lease termination, the Company received net proceeds of $1.6 million which is included in gains, losses, and other items, net.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 is $7.8 million compared to $5.2 million a year ago. The increase of $2.6 million is due to a $63 million increase in the average line-of-credit balance between the two quarters as well as a rate increase of approximately 1.75%. Additional borrowings for capital leases and construction of the new Little Rock data center have also contributed to the increase in interest expense.

Other income decreased slightly to $0.6 million in the current quarter. Both in the current and prior year quarter, other income is composed primarily of interest income on notes receivable and investment income.

Income taxes

The effective tax rate for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 is 39% compared to 38% for the first quarter of the prior year. The difference is primarily due to the expiration of the research and experimentation credit effective December 31, 2005. If Congress reinstates this credit, the tax rate will be adjusted at that time to reflect the available tax credit.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Working Capital and Cash Flow

Working capital at June 30, 2006 totaled a negative $33.1 million compared to a negative $41.1 million at March 31, 2006. Total current assets remained flat with a $3.3 million increase in trade accounts receivable offset by a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $3.5 million. Current liabilities decreased $8.1 million due to decreases in deferred revenue of $11.6 million, payroll and other accruals of $6.7 million and accounts payable of $2.2 million offset by increases in income taxes payable of $4.9 million and current portion of long-term debt of $3.2 million. Dividends payable were recorded of $4.4 million since the dividend declared in May 2006 was not paid until July 2006.

Accounts receivable days sales outstanding (“DSO”) was 72 days at June 30, 2006 and was 68 days at March 31, 2006, and is calculated as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2006
   March 31,
2006

Numerator – trade accounts receivable, net

   $ 264,933    $ 261,624

Denominator:

     

Quarter revenue

     336,705      344,343

Number of days in quarter

     91      90
             

Average daily revenue

   $ 3,700    $ 3,826
             

Days sales outstanding

     72      68
             

Net cash provided by operating activities declined 8%, to $56.4 million. Earnings and earnings before depreciation and amortization both grew, but changes in operating assets and liabilities were negative for the quarter. In particular, deferred revenue decreased, due primarily to decreases in deferred revenue from one large customer. Accounts payable and other liabilities also represented uses of cash, due to timing of payments.

Investing activities used $17 million in cash. This was primarily deferral of costs of $16.9 million and capitalization of software of $5.7 million, offset by the collection of cash from EMC of $5.0 million. Capital expenditures were very small for the quarter. However, as noted in the supplemental cash flow information, the Company acquired $19.4 million of property under capital leases, and $15.3 million of software licenses under financing arrangements. Payments under these arrangements will be reflected in future cash flows as payments of debt.

 

24


Cash flows from financing activities primarily reflect payments of debt, sales of stock under options, and repurchases of treasury stock. Payments of debt of $67.9 million include payments on the line of credit of $39.4 million, capital lease payments of $18.9 million, software license payments of $7.8 million, and other debt payments of $1.7 million. Financing activities also includes $1.1 million of tax benefits of stock options exercised. While this number is not very significant, it is worth noting since this line is new in the cash flow statement due to the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123R.

Free cash flow available to equity is not a generally accepted accounting principle (“GAAP”) financial measure. A “non-GAAP financial measure” is defined as a numerical measure of the Company’s financial performance, financial position or cash flow that excludes (or includes) amounts that are included in (or excluded from) the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Free cash flow available to equity, as defined by the Company, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Management of the Company has included free cash flow available to equity in this filing because it represents the amount of money available for the Company’s discretionary spending, after funding all required payments including scheduled debt payments, and it therefore provides investors with a useful alternative measure of liquidity by allowing an assessment of the amount of cash available for general corporate and strategic purposes. The table below reconciles free cash flow available to equity to net cash provided by operating activities, the nearest comparable GAAP measure.

Previously the Company defined free cash flow as cash provided by operating activities less cash used by investing activities excluding the impact of investments in joint ventures and other business alliances and cash paid and/or received in acquisitions and dispositions. The definition of free cash flow is now revised to reflect free cash flow available to equity holders. As presented below, the new measure includes more components of cash flow, particularly required debt payments, which are all debt payments excluding payments on the line of credit.

The Company generated free cash flow available to equity of $11.9 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2006, and $5.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as shown in the table below:

 

     For the quarter ended
June 30
 
(dollars in thousands)    2006     2005  

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 56,350     $ 61,476  

Plus:

    

Payments received from investments

     783       721  

Less:

    

Capitalized software development costs

     (5,719 )     (5,673 )

Capital expenditures

     (217 )     (2,929 )

Deferral of costs and data acquisition costs

     (16,887 )     (16,192 )

Payments on capital leases and installment payment arrangements

     (18,905 )     (19,929 )

Payments on software and data license liabilities

     (7,847 )     (10,938 )

Other required debt payments

     (1,711 )     (1,357 )
                

Sub-total

     5,847       5,179  

Plus:

    

Tax benefit of stock options and warrants

     1,079       —    
                

Sub-total

     6,926       5,179  

Plus:

    

Cash collected from sale of software

     5,000       —    
                

Free cash flow available to equity

   $ 11,926     $ 5,179  
                

On November 14, 2002, the Company announced a common stock repurchase program. From that date until June 30, 2006, the Company has repurchased 21.8 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $404.2 million (average price of $18.54 per share) under this repurchase program. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, 0.6 million shares were repurchased for an aggregate purchase price of $13.9 million. Cash paid for repurchases differs from the aggregate purchase price due to trades at the end of the current and prior quarter, which were settled shortly after the end of their respective purchase periods. Cash paid for repurchases in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $12.0 million.

 

25


The Company intends to use its future cash flow to repay debt, to repurchase shares of its common stock (when accretive to earnings per share), for possible future acquisitions, for payments of dividends, and for other general business purposes.

Credit and Debt Facilities

The Company had available credit lines of $500 million of which $241.7 million was outstanding at June 30, 2006. The Company’s debt-to-capital ratio, as calculated below, was 34% at June 30, 2006 compared to 35% at March 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands).

 

     June 30,
2006
    March 31,
2006
 

Numerator - long-term obligations, net of current installments

   $ 374,846     $ 376,415  
                

Denominator:

    

Long-term obligations, net of current installments

     374,846       376,415  

Stockholders’ equity

     720,553       706,177  
                
   $ 1,095,399     $ 1,082,592  
                

Debt-to-capital ratio

     34 %     35 %
                

The foregoing calculation of the debt-to-capital ratio excludes current maturities of long-term obligations in the amounts of $96.7 million and $93.5 million at June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively.

Funded Software Arrangement

On December 29, 2005, the Company entered into a definitive Asset Purchase and License Agreement (the “Agreement”) with EMC Corporation (“EMC”). The Agreement provides, among other things, for the purchase by EMC of the Company’s information grid operating system software (the “Base Technology”) and for the grant of a perpetual license from EMC to the Company of the Base Technology and further developments for the Company’s continued use in connection with its business. The Company also licensed other ancillary related technology to EMC.

Under the terms of the agreement, the parties will work together to further develop the Base Technology. EMC paid the Company $20 million in December 2005, $5 million in April 2006, and $5 million in July 2006. The agreement also gives EMC the option during a two-year option period to acquire the Acxiom division responsible for the further development of the technology, upon payment of an option price specified in the agreement. The option price is $5 million at inception and increases to $20 million by the end of the option period. If EMC exercises that option, Acxiom will retain its perpetual license to the Base Technology and further developments of the Base Technology.

Payments received by Acxiom from EMC under the Agreement will offset previously capitalized software balances associated with development of the sold and licensed technology and amounts capitalized in the future to further develop the technology. These payments have no effect on revenue, earnings, or operating cash flow, but do contribute to free cash flow available to equity. The reduction in the capitalized balance will reduce future amortization expense.

 

26


Off-Balance Sheet Items and Commitments

The Company has entered into synthetic operating lease facilities for computer equipment, furniture and aircraft (“Leased Assets”). These synthetic operating lease facilities are accounted for as operating leases under GAAP and are treated as capital leases for income tax reporting purposes. Lease terms under the computer equipment and furniture facility range from two to six years, with the Company having the option at expiration of the initial term to return, or purchase at a fixed price, or extend or renew the term of the leased equipment. The synthetic lease term for one aircraft expires in January 2011, with the Company having the option at the expiration to either purchase the aircraft at a fixed price, enter into a lease for an additional twelve-month period (with a nominal purchase price paid at the expiration of the renewal period), or return the aircraft in the condition and manner required by the lease. In the event the Company elects to return the Leased Assets, the Company has guaranteed a portion of the residual value to the lessors. Assuming the Company elects to return the Leased Assets to the lessors at its earliest opportunity under the synthetic lease arrangements and assuming the Leased Assets have no significant residual value to the lessors, the maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these residual value guarantees was $5.4 million at June 30, 2006. Since the inception of the facility, the total amount drawn under these synthetic operating lease facilities was $228.9 million, and as of June 30, 2006 the Company has a future commitment for lease payments of $17.6 million over the next five years.

During fiscal 2006, the Company terminated the lease for a second aircraft which was then sold by the lessor. Under the terms of the lease, the Company was entitled to the proceeds of the airplane sale, net of the payoff value of the lease. As a result of this lease termination, the Company received net proceeds of $1.6 million which is included in gains, losses and other items.

The Company has completed construction on an additional 30,000 square foot data center in Little Rock, Arkansas to be occupied in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Total construction costs of this facility were approximately $18 million. In connection with certain of the Company’s other buildings and facilities, the Company has entered into 50/50 joint ventures with local real estate developers. In each case, the Company is guaranteeing portions of the loans for the buildings. In addition, in connection with the disposal of certain assets, the Company has guaranteed loans for the buyers of the assets. Substantially all of the third party indebtedness for which the Company has provided guarantees is collateralized by various pieces of real property. The aggregate amount of the guarantees at June 30, 2006 were $5.2 million.

Outstanding letters of credit which reduce the borrowing capacity under the Company’s revolving credit facility at both June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 were $4.0 million.

 

27


Contractual Commitments

The following table presents Acxiom’s contractual cash obligations and purchase commitments at June 30, 2006 (dollars in thousands). The column for 2007 represents the nine months ending March 31, 2007. All other columns represent fiscal years ending March 31.

 

     For the years ending March 31
     2007    2008    2009    2010    2011    Thereafter    Total

Capital lease and installment payment obligations

   $ 50,568    $ 43,005    $ 14,607    $ 2,870    $ 1,728    $ 11,650    $ 124,428

Software and data license liabilities

     24,210      19,963      10,075      1,111      —        —        55,359

Warrant liability

     —        —        —        —        —        1,827      1,827

Other long-term debt

     5,362      6,821      14,365      244,877      1,076      17,432      289,933
                                                

Total long-term obligations

     80,140      69,789      39,047      248,858      2,804      30,909      471,547
                                                

Synthetic aircraft leases

     699      931      931      931      698      —        4,190

Synthetic equipment and furniture leases

     4,069      4,863      4,028      440      —        —        13,400
                                                

Total synthetic operating leases

     4,768      5,794      4,959      1,371      698      —        17,590

Equipment operating leases

     4,277      1,840      783      74      5      —        6,979

Building operating leases

     14,399      15,292      13,235      10,981      8,227      52,254      114,388

Partnerships building leases

     1,601      2,144      2,155      47      —        —        5,947

Related party aircraft lease

     675      900      900      900      900      375      4,650
                                                

Total operating lease payments

     25,720      25,970      22,032      13,373      9,830      52,629      149,554

Operating software license obligations

     4,488      4,798      4,621      4,605      1,087      1,630      21,229
                                                

Total operating lease and software license obligations

     30,208      30,768      26,653      17,978      10,917      54,259      170,783
                                                

Total contractual cash obligations

   $ 110,348    $ 100,557    $ 65,700    $ 266,836    $ 13,721    $ 85,168    $ 642,330
                                                
     For the years ending March 31
     2007    2008    2009    2010    2011    Thereafter    Total

Purchase commitments on synthetic aircraft leases

   $ —      $ —      $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 4,398    $ 4,398

Purchase commitments on synthetic equipment and furniture leases

     —        1,862      1,755      1,137      —        —        4,754

Other purchase commitments

     53,575      21,267      8,087      6,066      4,680      4,897      98,572
                                                

Total purchase commitments

   $ 53,575    $ 23,129    $ 9,842    $ 7,203    $ 4,680    $ 9,295    $ 107,724
                                                

 

28


The related party aircraft lease relates to an aircraft leased from a business owned by an officer and director. The Company has agreed to pay the difference, if any, between the sales price of the aircraft and 70% of the related loan balance (approximately $3.0 million at June 30, 2006) should the Company elect to exercise its early termination rights or not extend the lease beyond its initial term and the lessor sells the equipment as a result.

The purchase commitments on the synthetic equipment, furniture and aircraft leases assume the leases terminate and are not renewed, and the Company elects to purchase the assets. The other purchase commitments include contractual commitments for the purchase of data and open purchase orders for equipment, paper, office supplies, construction and other items. Other purchase commitments in some cases will be satisfied by entering into future operating leases, capital leases, or other financing arrangements, rather than payment of cash.

The following table shows contingencies or guarantees under which the Company could be required, in certain circumstances, to make cash payments as of June 30, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

 

Residual value guarantee on the synthetic computer equipment and furniture lease

   $ 2,768

Residual value guarantee on synthetic aircraft lease

     2,639

Residual value guarantee on related party aircraft lease

     2,995

Guarantees on certain partnership and other loans

     5,174

Outstanding letters of credit

     3,966

The total of loans “on certain partnerships and other loans,” of which the Company guarantees the portion noted in the above table, are $12.7 million as of June 30, 2006.

While the Company does not have any other material contractual commitments for capital expenditures, certain levels of investments in facilities and computer equipment continue to be necessary to support the growth of the business. It is the Company’s general practice to lease any new required equipment to better match cash outflows with customer inflows. In some cases, the Company also sells software and hardware to clients. In addition, new outsourcing or facilities management contracts frequently require substantial up-front capital expenditures to acquire or replace existing assets. Management believes that the Company’s existing available debt and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet the Company’s working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the foreseeable future. The Company also evaluates acquisitions from time to time, which may require up-front payments of cash. Depending on the size of the acquisition it may be necessary to raise additional capital. If additional capital becomes necessary as a result of any material variance of operating results from projections or from potential future acquisitions, the Company would first use available borrowing capacity under its revolving credit agreement, followed by the issuance of debt or equity securities. However, no assurance can be given that the Company would be able to obtain funding through the issuance of debt or equity securities at terms favorable to the Company, or that such funding would be available.

For a description of certain risks that could have an impact on results of operations or financial condition, including liquidity and capital resources, see the “Risk Factors” contained in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.

Related Parties

In accordance with a data center management agreement dated July 27, 1992 between Acxiom and TransUnion, Acxiom (through its subsidiary, Acxiom CDC, Inc.) acquired all of TransUnion’s interest in its Chicago data center and agreed to provide TransUnion with various data center management services. In a 1992 letter agreement, Acxiom agreed to use its best efforts to cause one person designated by TransUnion to be elected to Acxiom’s board of directors. TransUnion designated its CEO and President, Harry C. Gambill, who was appointed to fill a vacancy on the board in November 1992 and was elected at the 1993 annual meeting of stockholders to serve a three-year term. He was elected to serve additional three-year terms at subsequent annual stockholders meetings. He resigned from the board effective February 28, 2006 at which time transactions with TransUnion were no longer considered related-party transactions. Acxiom recorded revenue from TransUnion of $27.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.

See note 15 to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for additional information on certain relationships and related transactions.

 

29


Non-U.S. Operations

The Company has a presence in the United Kingdom, France, The Netherlands, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Poland, Australia and China. Most of the Company’s exposure to exchange rate fluctuation is due to translation gains and losses as there are no material transactions that cause exchange rate impact. In general, each of the foreign locations is expected to fund its own operations and cash flows, although funds may be loaned or invested from the U.S. to the foreign subsidiaries subject to limitations in the Company’s revolving credit facility. These advances are considered to be long-term investments, and any gain or loss resulting from changes in exchange rates as well as gains or losses resulting from translating the foreign financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Exchange rate movements of foreign currencies may have an impact on the Company’s future costs or on future cash flows from foreign investments. The Company has not entered into any foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative instruments to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These accounting principles require management to make certain judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2006 annual report include a summary of significant accounting policies used in the preparation of Acxiom’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis filed as part of the 2006 annual report contains a discussion of the policies which management has identified as the most critical because they require management’s use of complex and/or significant judgments. The following paragraphs are intended to update that discussion only for the critical accounting policies or estimates which have materially changed since the date of the last annual report.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill – Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. In cases where cash flows cannot be associated with individual assets, assets are grouped together in order to associate cash flows with the asset group. If such assets or asset groups are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. At June 30, 2006, the Company believes that no impairment exists with respect to its long-lived assets. However, no assurance can be given by management of the Company that future impairment charges to its long-lived assets will not be required as a result of changes in events and/or circumstances.

Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair values of net assets acquired in business combinations treated as purchase transactions. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed annually for impairment under a two-part test. In the event that part one of the impairment test indicates potential impairment of goodwill, performance of part two of the impairment test is required. Any impairment that results from the completion of the two-part test is recorded as a charge to operations during the period in which the impairment test is completed. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment evaluation as of the beginning of its fiscal year. The Company has completed part one of an annual, two-part impairment analysis of its goodwill and has determined that no impairment of its goodwill existed as of April 1, 2006. Accordingly, step two of the goodwill impairment test was not required for fiscal 2007. Changes in circumstances may require the Company to perform impairment testing on a more frequent basis. No assurance can be given by the Company that additional impairment tests will not require an impairment charge during future periods should circumstances indicate that the Company’s goodwill balances are impaired.

In completing step one of the test and making the assessment that no potential impairment of the Company’s goodwill existed, management has made a number of estimates and assumptions. In particular, the growth in operating income and discount rates used by management in determining the fair value of each of the Company’s reporting units through a discounted cash flow analysis significantly affect the outcome of the impairment test, as well as numerous other factors. For the International segment, management has used growth rates ranging from minus 20% to a positive 65% for the first year, 5% to 15% for years two through five, and 3% to 5% thereafter. For the US segment, management has used growth rates of 20% to 30% for the first year, 5% to 15% for years two through five, and 3% to 5% thereafter.

 

30


Management has used a discount rate of 12 percent for both segments, representing an approximation of the Company’s weighted-average cost of capital, which resulted in an excess of fair value over the net assets of each of the Company’s reporting units. Assuming the same growth rates, a discount rate of greater than 14 percent would be necessary to indicate potential impairment of the International segment and a discount rate of greater than 26% would be necessary to indicate impairment of the US segment, resulting in the need to proceed to step two of the impairment test. Alternatively, assuming the 12 percent discount rate but assuming no growth for the US segment and only 7% for the International segment for the first five years and 3% growth thereafter would also not indicate impairment. Additionally, the Company has determined that its reporting units should be aggregated up to reportable segments for use in analyzing its goodwill and assessing any potential impairment thereof, on the basis of similar economic characteristics in accordance with the guidance in SFAS No. 131 and SFAS No. 142. However, should a determination be made that such aggregation of some or all of the Company’s reporting units is not appropriate, the results of step one of the goodwill impairment test could, in the future, indicate that potential impairment does exist, requiring the Company to proceed to step two of the test and possibly recording an impairment of its goodwill.

Share-Based Compensation Accounting – The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123R”) which requires compensation cost related to stock options and other share-based payments be recognized in the financial statements. The Company adopted SFAS 123R, effective April 1, 2006, using the modified prospective transition method and therefore has not restated results for prior periods. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost must be recognized for all share-based payments granted after the adoption of SFAS 123R and for all awards granted prior to the adoption date which remain unvested on the adoption date. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, and prior to adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company accelerated vesting of substantially all unvested options. Remaining unvested share-based compensation granted prior to April 1, 2006, relates to options granted to outside directors which were not accelerated, options held by certain terminated associates that will be forfeited or cancelled with the passage of time, options issued as a result of the Digital Impact acquisition (see note 4) and restricted stock units granted during fiscal 2006. Therefore, the Company believes it will not be required to recognize significant compensation expense in future periods associated with share-based payments granted prior to adoption of SFAS 123R. (See note 3 – Share-based compensation.)

New Accounting Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”) in June, 2006. FIN 48 requires a company to use a more-likely-than-not standard in recognizing the benefit of a position taken in a tax return. FIN 48 will be effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2007. Any adjustment required by the implementation of FIN 48 will be reflected as an adjustment to the balance of retained earnings as a change in accounting principle. The Company has not yet assessed the impact of applying FIN 48 to its tax positions.

Recent Events

On August 5, 2006 the Company entered into an agreement with VA Partners, LLC, ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.L.P., ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., and ValueAct Capital Management, LLC. A copy of the agreement was filed as an exhibit on Form 8-K on August 7, 2006.

 

31


Forward-looking Statements

This document and other written reports and oral statements made from time to time by the Company and its representatives contain forward-looking statements. These statements, which are not statements of historical fact, may contain estimates, assumptions, projections and/or expectations regarding the Company’s financial position, results of operations, market position, product development, growth opportunities, economic conditions, and other similar forecasts and statements of expectation. The Company generally indicates these statements by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “foresee,” and similar words or phrases. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual results and experiences to differ materially from the anticipated results and expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements.

Such statements may include but are not necessarily limited to the following:

 

    That the Company is continuing to experience continued improvement and momentum in financial performance;

 

    that the Company expects continued focus on expense controls will lead to continued improvement in operating margins;

 

    that the projected revenue, operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, operating cash flow and free cash flow, borrowings, dividends and other metrics will be within estimated ranges;

 

    that the Company has identified categories of opportunity that provide upside to the ranges of financial projections;

 

    that the estimations of revenue, earnings, cash flow, growth rates, restructuring charges and expense reductions will be within the estimated ranges; and

 

    that the business pipeline and anticipated cost structure will allow the Company to continue to meet or exceed revenue, cash flow and other projections.

The factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following:

 

    The possibility that we may incur expenses related to unsolicited proposals or other efforts by others to acquire or control the Company;

 

    certain contracts may not be closed, or may not be closed within the anticipated time frames;

 

    the possibility that due to issues attendant to the current proxy contest clients may attempt to reduce the amount of business they do with the Company;

 

    the possibility that a significant disruption to the business of the Company may result from the current proxy contest;

 

    the possibility that in the event that a change of control was sought that certain of the clients of the Company would invoke certain provisions in their contracts resulting in a decline in the revenue and profit of the company

 

    the possibility that certain contracts may not generate the anticipated revenue or profitability;

 

    the possibility that negative changes in economic or other conditions might lead to a reduction in demand for our products and services;

 

    the possibility of an economic slowdown or that economic conditions in general will not be as expected;

 

    the possibility that the historical seasonality of our business may change;

 

    the possibility that significant customers may experience extreme, severe economic difficulty;

 

    the possibility that the integration of acquired businesses may not be as successful as planned;

 

    the possibility that the fair value of certain of our assets may not be equal to the carrying value of those assets now or in future time periods;

 

    the possibility that sales cycles may lengthen;

 

    the possibility that we may not be able to attract and retain qualified technical and leadership associates, or that we may lose key associates to other organizations;

 

    the possibility that we won’t be able to properly motivate our sales force or other associates;

 

    the possibility that we won’t be able to achieve cost reductions and avoid unanticipated costs;

 

32


    the possibility that we won’t be able to continue to receive credit upon satisfactory terms and conditions;

 

    the possibility that competent, competitive products, technologies or services will be introduced into the marketplace by other companies;

 

    the possibility that we may be subjected to pricing pressure due to market conditions and/or competitive products and services;

 

    the possibility that there will be changes in consumer or business information industries and markets that negatively impact the Company;

 

    the possibility that changes in accounting pronouncements may occur and may impact these projections;

 

    the possibility that we won’t be able to protect proprietary information and technology or to obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms;

 

    the possibility that we may encounter difficulties when entering new markets or industries;

 

    the possibility that there will be changes in the legislative, accounting, regulatory and consumer environments affecting our business, including but not limited to litigation, legislation, regulations and customs relating to our ability to collect, manage, aggregate and use data;

 

    the possibility that data suppliers might withdraw data from us, leading to our inability to provide certain products and services;

 

    the possibility that we may enter into short-term contracts which would affect the predictability of our revenues;

 

    the possibility that the amount of ad hoc, volume-based and project work will not be as expected;

 

    the possibility that we may experience a loss of data center capacity or interruption of telecommunication links or power sources;

 

    the possibility that we may experience failures or breaches of our network and data security systems, leading to potential adverse publicity, negative customer reaction, or liability to third parties;

 

    the possibility that postal rates may increase, thereby leading to reduced volumes of business;

 

    the possibility that our clients may cancel or modify their agreements with us;

 

    the possibility that we will not successfully complete customer contract requirements on time or meet the service levels specified in the contracts, which may result in contract penalties or lost revenue;

 

    the possibility that we experience processing errors which result in credits to customers, re-performance of services or payment of damages to customers;

 

    the possibility that the services of the United States Postal Service, their global counterparts and other delivery systems may be disrupted; and

 

    the possibility that we may be affected by other competitive factors.

With respect to formulation of forward-looking statements, all of the above factors apply, along with the following assumptions:

 

    That the U.S. and global economies will continue to improve at a moderate pace;

 

    that global growth will continue to be strong and that globalization trends will continue to grow at an increasing pace;

 

    that Acxiom’s computer, communications and other equipment expenses will continue to fall as a percentage of revenue;

 

33


    that the Customer Information Infrastructure (CII) grid-based environment at Acxiom will continue to be implemented successfully over the next 3-4 years and that the new CII infrastructure will continue to provide increasing operational efficiencies;

 

    that the acquisitions of companies operating primarily outside of the United States will be successfully integrated; and that significant efficiencies will be realized from this integration;

 

    relating to operating cash flow and free cash flow available to equity, that sufficient operating and capital lease arrangements will continue to be available to the Company to provide for the financing of most of its computer equipment and that software suppliers will continue to provide financing arrangements for most of the software purchases;

 

    relating to revolving credit line balance, that free cash flow available to equity will meet expectations and that the Company will use cash flow to pay down bank debt, buy back stock and fund dividends;

 

    relating to annual dividends, that the board of directors will continue to approve quarterly dividends and will vote to increase dividends over time;

 

    relating to diluted shares, that the Company will meet its cash flow expectations and that potential dilution created through the issuance of stock options and warrants will be mitigated by continued stock repurchases in accordance with the Company’s stock repurchase program.

With respect to the provision of products or services outside our primary base of operations in the United States, all of the above factors apply, along with the difficulty of doing business in numerous sovereign jurisdictions due to differences in scale, competition, culture, laws and regulations.

Other factors are detailed from time to time in periodic reports and registration statements filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company believes that we have the product and technology offerings, facilities, associates and competitive and financial resources for continued business success, but future revenues, costs, margins and profits are all influenced by a number of factors, including those discussed above, all of which are inherently difficult to forecast.

In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information or otherwise.

 

34


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Acxiom’s earnings are affected by changes in short-term interest rates primarily as a result of its revolving credit agreement, which bears interest at a floating rate. Acxiom does not currently use derivative or other financial instruments to mitigate the interest rate risk. Risk can be estimated by measuring the impact of a near-term adverse movement of 10% in short-term market interest rates. If short-term market interest rates increase 10% during the next four quarters compared to the previous four quarters, there would be no material adverse impact on Acxiom’s results of operations. Acxiom has no material future earnings or cash flow expenses from changes in interest rates related to its other long-term debt obligations as substantially all of Acxiom’s remaining long-term debt instruments have fixed rates. At both June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, the fair value of Acxiom’s fixed rate long-term obligations approximated carrying value.

The Company has a presence in the United Kingdom, France, The Netherlands, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Poland, Australia, and China. In general, each of the foreign locations is expected to fund its own operations and cash flows, although funds may be loaned or invested from the U.S. to the foreign subsidiaries. Therefore, exchange rate movements of foreign currencies may have an impact on Acxiom’s future costs or on future cash flows from foreign investments. Acxiom, at this time, has not entered into any foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative instruments to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

An evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company Leader (Chief Executive Officer) and Chief Finance and Administration Leader (Chief Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” which are defined under SEC rules as controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. Based upon that evaluation, the Company Leader and Chief Finance and Administration Leader concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

 

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management, including the Company Leader (Chief Executive Officer) and the Chief Finance and Administration Leader (Chief Financial Officer), has evaluated any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period covered by this report, and has concluded that there was no change during the quarterly period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

35


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various claims and litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of the business. None of these, however, are believed to be material in their nature or scope, except as follows:

April Bell v. Acxiom Corporation (U.S. District Court, E.D. Arkansas, 4-06-CV-0485). This putative class action lawsuit case was filed April 17, 2006. It alleges that Acxiom had a duty to notify consumers of security breach incidents that occurred in 2003. Among other things, the complaint seeks an order requiring Acxiom to notify all class members in writing of the times their private information was breached, how it was breached, by whom, and what action Acxiom has taken to prevent further breaches of security. The plaintiff also seeks an order requiring Acxiom to remove the class members’ private information from its computer systems and enjoining Acxiom from obtaining such private information from the class in the future. The complaint also seeks compensatory and punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees. To date, a class has not been certified. We believe the case is without merit and we intend to defend the case vigorously. A motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted has been filed and is currently pending.

Indiana State District Council of Laborers and HOD Carriers Pension Fund v. Charles Morgan, et al. (Pulaski County, Arkansas, Circuit Court, CV-05-8498). This case was filed June 23, 2005 against Charles Morgan and members of the Acxiom Board of Directors alleging that the board breached its fiduciary duty to the Company and its shareholders by failing to consider in good faith two acquisition proposals made by ValueAct Capital, in an attempt to entrench themselves as managers and directors of Acxiom. Among other things, the plaintiff seeks an order compelling the board to consider ValueAct’s offer in good faith and an award of attorneys’ fees. The defendants believe the case is without merit and have moved to dismiss the case.

Linda Brooks and Richard Fresco v. Auto Data Direct, Inc., et al., (U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida, 03-61063). This putative class action lawsuit, removed to federal court in May 2003, was filed against Acxiom and several other information providers. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants obtained and used drivers license data in violation of the federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act. Among other things, the plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorneys’ fees. To date, a class has not been certified. No significant judicial action has been taken on the case until recently, when the court ordered the parties to submit to mediation, which has been in progress. If a settlement in an amount acceptable to Acxiom cannot be reached, we will continue to defend the case vigorously. We believe that we have acted in conformity with all applicable laws.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(a) Not Applicable

(b) Not Applicable

(c) The table below provides information regarding purchases by Acxiom of its Common Stock during the periods indicated.

 

Period

   Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
   Average Price
Paid
Per Share
   Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or Programs
  

Maximum Number (or Approximate
Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the

Plans or Programs

4/1/06 – 4/30/06

   —      —      —      $ 159,844,676

5/1/06 – 5/31/06

   430,970    24.26    430,970      149,388,559

6/1/06 – 6/30/06

   145,000    23.52    145,000      145,978,623
                     

Total

   575,970    24.07    575,970    $ 145,978,623
                     

The repurchases listed above were made pursuant to a repurchase program adopted by the Board of Directors on October 30, 2002. Since that time the Board has approved increases in the maximum dollar amount which may be repurchased from $50 million to $550 million. The repurchase program has no designated expiration date.

 

36


Item 6. Exhibits

 

  (a) The following exhibits are filed with this Report:

 

            31.1    Certification of Company Leader (principal executive officer) pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2    Certification of Chief Finance and Administration Leader (principal financial and accounting officer) pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1    Certification of Company Leader (principal executive officer) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2    Certification of Chief Finance and Administration Leader (principal financial and accounting officer) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

37


ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Acxiom Corporation

Dated: August 7, 2006

 

By:  

/s/ Rodger S. Kline

  (Signature)
  Rodger S. Kline
  Chief Finance and Administration Leader
  (principal financial and accounting officer)

 

38

Section 302 CEO Certification

EXHIBIT 31.1

ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles D. Morgan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Acxiom Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

 

  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 7, 2006

 

By:  

/s/ Charles D. Morgan

  Charles D. Morgan
  Company Leader
  (principal executive officer)
Section 302 CFO Certification

EXHIBIT 31.2

ACXIOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION

I, Rodger S. Kline, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Acxiom Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

 

  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 7, 2006

 

By:  

/s/ Rodger S. Kline

  Rodger S. Kline
  Chief Finance & Administration Leader
  (principal financial officer)
Section 906 CEO Certification

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Acxiom Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles D. Morgan, Company Leader (principal executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Charles D. Morgan

Charles D. Morgan
Company Leader
(principal executive officer)
August 7, 2006
Section 906 CFO Certification

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Acxiom Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rodger S. Kline, Chief Finance & Administration Leader (principal financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Rodger S. Kline

Rodger S. Kline
Chief Finance & Administration Leader
(principal financial officer)
August 7, 2006